Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates

CAROLINA CENTRAL RAILWAY CO. v. COMMISSIONERS OF RICHMOND COUNTY.

(Same syllabus as in the next preceding case of Wade v. The Commissioners of Craven, which is cited and approved.)

As the case was decided in this court upon a question of law, it is unnecessary to report the facts.

The ground upon which the appeal was based was, an excessive valuation of the property of the plaintiff for taxation. No error in matter of law was alleged as ground for the appeal.

Upon the hearing, his Honor, upon motion of the defendant's counsel, dismissed the proceedings on the ground that the court had no jurisdiction thereof. From this judgment the plaintiff appealed.

SETTLE, J.

The only points presented by this record are decided in Wade v. Commissioners of Craven County, ante, 81.

We refer to that decision for the reasons which induce us to declare, that the judgment of his Honor in this case is affirmed.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed.

(85)

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

R. R. v. COMMISSIONERS OF RICHMOND
(Jan 1, 1876)