Citation Codes Equivalent Citations citation codes Advocates John W. Boyle for Oswald Prentiss Backus for See more information ... Smart Summary Factual and Procedural Background Clara A. Schumaker was the respondent, and Joshua Mather and others were the appellants in an appeal before the Court of Appeals of the State of New York. The court decided the matter on April 26, 1892. [1][2] Legal Issues Presented The opinion addresses a procedural matter and does not frame distinct legal issues. Arguments of the Parties The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments. Table of Precedents Cited No precedents were cited in the provided opinion. Court's Reasoning and Analysis Justice Gray read for affirmance, and all members of the court concurred. The opinion provides no further reasoning or analysis. [3][4] Holding and Implications Judgment affirmed. The lower-court judgment remained in effect against the appellants. The opinion discusses no broader implications and states no new precedent. [5] Show full summary ... OPINION CLARA A. SCHUMAKER, Respondent, v. JOSHUA MATHER et al., Appellants. GRAY, J., reads for affirmance. All concur. Judgment affirmed.