Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges

STATE, Respondent, v. JOHN WEEKS and CECIL WHITAKER, Appellants.

WILLIAM A. LEE, C. J.

The appellants, John Weeks and Cecil Whitaker, were informed against, with others, by the prosecuting attorney in the district court of the fifth judicial district, in and for the county of Bannock, charged with the crime of grand larceny in the taking, stealing and carrying away of certain cattle, and were convicted of the crime charged in the information. A motion for a new trial was made and denied. From the order denying the motion and the judgment of conviction, this appeal is taken. No brief has been filed by appellants nor has any appearance been made by them or on their behalf. At the time the cause was reached for oral argument in this court the state moved for an affirmance of the judgment in accordance with the provisions of Rule 48 of this court.

Upon an examination of the record, no errors appear in the trial of the cause below, and under this rule the judgment of the court below is hereby affirmed.

Wm. E. Lee, Budge, Givens and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. WEEKS
(Jul 3, 1925)