Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges

L. L. MILLION, Respondent, v. W. G. SAMPSON and OTIS SAMPSON, Appellants.

TAYLOR, J.

The judgment appealed from was rendered March 14, 1923, and the transcript on appeal filed in this court May 10, 1924. When the cause was reached on the calendar, February 18, 1926, no briefs had been submitted by the appellants or respondent, and appellants were not represented by counsel in court. The attorney for the respondent moved to dismiss the appeal under Rule 48.

We have examined the record, and find no fundamental error of the court in directing a verdict and entering judgment for the plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed. Costs to respondent.

William A. Lee, C.J., and Win. E. Lee, Budge and Givens, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MILLION v. SAMPSON
(Mar 1, 1926)