Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates

Quaker City National Bank, Appellant, v. Brooks et al.

Appeals — Interlocutory order — Answer to interrogatories — Rule for judgment.

An order discharging a rule for judgment against a garnishee on its answer to interrogatories, is interlocutory and not appealable.

Argued April 15, 1929.

PER CURIAM, May 13, 1929:

This is an appeal by plaintiff from an order discharging a rule for judgment against the garnishee on its answers to interrogatories. Such an order is interlocutory and not appealable: Brendlinger v. Riegel, 37 Pa. Super. 474.

The appeal is quashed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

QUAKER CITY N. BK. v. BROOKS ET AL
(May 13, 1929)