Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. THOMAS CORRIGAN et al., Appellants.

Per Curiam.

There is no evidence tending to prove that defendants entered the garage at 34 Ridgeland road or any other garage, or that they tried the doors of the house at 34 Ridgeland road or any other house or that they even entered upon private premises at No. 34 Ridgeland road or at No. 10 Avondale road or any other private premises or that they committed any of the acts set forth in the information. There is no evidence that either defendant committed any act which seriously disturbed or endangered the public peace or health or in any manner violated the provisions of section 43 of the Penal Law. The judgment of the County Court and that of the Court of Special Sessions should be reversed and the information dismissed.

CARDOZO, Ch. J., POUND, CRANE, LEHMAN, KELLOGG, O'BRIEN and HUBBS, JJ., concur.

Judgments reversed, etc.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. CORRIGAN
(Mar 18, 1930)