Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates

STATE v. MRS. JOHN TURPIN AND FRANK SHERRILL.

Criminal Law G e — Evidence of reputation of defendant's garage for selling liquor held incompetent as hearsay evidence.

In a prosecution for violation of the prohibition laws evidence that the defendant's garage had the reputation of selling liquor is incompetent as hearsay evidence.

Criminal prosecution tried upon indictment charging the defendant, and another, with violations of the prohibition laws.

Lee Birchfield, a character witness for Mrs. Turpin, was asked on cross-examination the following question:

"Q. What is the reputation of the defendant's home in regard to selling liquor? (Objection; overruled; exception.) A. That is the reputation of that filling station, it has been liquor. I don't know I could buy whiskey there for sure, but I have got some reports on the filling station."

From an adverse verdict and judgment of six months in jail, the defendant appeals, assigning errors.

STACY, C. J.

The evidence respecting the reputation of defendant's garage for selling liquor was hearsay and should have been excluded. S. v. Springs, 184 N.C. 768, 114 S.E. 851; S. v. Mills, 184 N.C. 694, 114 S.E. 314. The identical question was before the Court in the two cases just cited. Further discussion would only call for a repetition of what was said in these cases.

New trial.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. TURPIN
(Jun 1, 1932)