Defendant husband held in contempt for failing to pay — in fact, making no effort to pay — the weekly sum ordered by the court.
PER CURIAM.
The order under review will be affirmed, for the reasons stated by Vice-Chancellor Backes.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, BROGAN, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, DEAR, WELLS, KERNEY, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.