Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates

THE CENTRAL UNITED NATIONAL BANK OF CLEVELAND v. HENDLER, ET AL.

Supreme Court — Affirmances — Judges equally divided.

It appearing that the judges of the court are equally divided in opinion as to the merits of this case (the court now being constituted of but six judges) and are for that reason unable to agree upon a judgment, and the entry of that fact constituting an affirmance of the Judgment of the Court of Appeals, it is ordered that the defendants in error recover from plaintiff in error their costs herein expended.

Judgment affirmed.

WEVGANDT, C.J., DAY and JONES, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CENTRAL UNITED NATIONAL BANK OF CLEVE. v. HENDLER
(Jun 7, 1933)