Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
  • Squire, Sanders Dempsey,
  • Day Day,
  • Harrington, Huxley Smith, Mr. Union C. DeFord
  • Mr. Park Chamberlain, for plaintiffs in
  • Baker, Hostetler, Sidlo Patterson
  • Manchester, Ford, Bennett Powers, for defendants in
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
  • Squire, Sanders Dempsey,
  • Day Day,
  • Harrington, Huxley Smith, Mr. Union C. DeFord
  • Mr. Park Chamberlain, for plaintiffs in
  • Baker, Hostetler, Sidlo Patterson
  • Manchester, Ford, Bennett Powers, for defendants in
See more information ...
Smart Summary

WICK ET AL. v. THE YOUNGSTOWN SHEET AND TUBE CO. ET AL. (TWO CASES.)

Supreme Court — Dismissals — No debatable constitutional question involved.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petitions in error be, and the same hereby are, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said causes.

Petitions in error dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ALLEN, STEPHENSON, JONES, MATTHIAS, BEVIS and ZIMMERMAN, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

WICK v. SHEET TUBE CO
(Nov 1, 1933)