Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates

LITMAN v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL.

Supreme Court — Dismissals — Public Utilities Commission rescinded action — Motor transportation companies.

It appearing to the court that the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, the defendant in error herein, having this day entered its order rescinding its action herein complained of and having reinstated this proceeding upon the docket of pending applications before said commission, that the errors complained of in the petition in error filed herein have thereby been corrected, this proceeding in error is hereby dismissed.

Petition in error dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ALLEN, STEPHENSON, JONES, MATTHIAS, BEVIS and ZIMMERMAN, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LITMAN v. P. U. C. O
(Mar 7, 1934)