Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE v. BALDWIN ET AL., PAINTER, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court — Dismissals — No debatable constitutional question involved — Misapplication of funds by director of Federal Reserve member bank — Section 710-172, General Code — Offense also federal under Title 12, Section 592, U.S. Code — Jurisdiction of state, when offense also cognizable under federal law.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed, for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., JONES, MATTHIAS, DAY, ZIMMERMAN, WILLIAMS and MYERS, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. BALDWIN
(Mar 3, 1937)