Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Deeds — Building restrictions — Exclusively for private dwelling house purposes — Injunction against erection of tennis court and backstops on adjacent lot — Article I, Section 1, and Article I, Section 19, Constitution.
It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., MATTHIAS, DAY, ZIMMERMAN, WILLIAMS, MYERS and GORMAN, JJ., concur.