Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

FREDERICK A. SPEIK, Appellant, v. I.O. SUTPHIN, Respondent.

GIBSON, J.

[1] This is an action to quiet title and to obtain declaratory relief in respect to rights arising under an oil lease. The action raises the same issues as those presented in the companion case of Sutphin v. Speik, L.A. No. 17142 ( ante, p. 195 [ 99 P.2d 652]), this day decided. On the authority of that case the judgment is affirmed.

Edmonds, J., Carter, J., Curtis, J., Waste, C.J., Wood, J., pro tem., and McComb, J., pro tem., concurred.

Rehearing denied. Shenk, J., and Houser, J., did not participate.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SPEIK v. SUTPHIN
(Feb 29, 1940)