GIVENS, J.
This action involves respective water rights, claimed by appellant and respondents in Black's Creek, alias Ten-Mile Creek, conflicting as to priority both in time and amount.
The assignments of error challenge only the findings of fact; thus, issues of fact alone are the essence of the controversy.
The evidence, though conflicting, is sufficient to sustain the findings of fact and the judgment is therefore affirmed. ( Evans v. Davidson, 58 Idaho 600, 77 P.2d 661; In re Randall's Estate, 58 Idaho 143, 70 P.2d 389; Eaton v. McWilliams, 52 Idaho 145, 12 P.2d 259; Walker v. Jackson, 48 Idaho 18, 279 P. 293; Eastwood v. Standard Mines Mill. Co., 11 Idaho 195, 81 P. 382; McKissick v. Oregon Short Line Ry Co., 13 Idaho 195, 89 Pac. 629; Patrick v. Bisbee, 52 Idaho 369, 15 P.2d 730; Gordon v. Sunshine Mining Co., 43 Idaho 439, 252 P. 870; Lisenby v. Intermountain State Bank, 33 Idaho 101, 190 P. 355.)
Costs awarded to respondent.
Budge, C.J., and Morgan, Holden and Ailshie, JJ., concur.