Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
  • Mr. T.B. Bryant and Messrs. Felder and Rosen, all of Orangeburg, Counsel for Appellant, cite: As to contract for personal services coming within Statute of Frauds: Code of 1932, Sec. 7044; 60 S.C. 373, 38 S.E., 599, 181 S.C. 360, 187 S.E., 524; 27 C.J., 186; 27 C.J., 182; 27 C.J., 180; 46 S.C.L., 176; 187 S.C. 79, 196 S.E., 538; and cases therein discussed; 27 C.J., 176. As to lack of mutuality in alleged contracts for personal services: 182 S.C. 81, 188 S.E., 499. Messrs. Zeigler and Brailsford, of Orangeburg, counsel for Respondent, cite: As to Statute of Frauds being a bar to this action: 110 S.C. 534, 96 S.E., 538; 187 S.C. 79, 196 S.E., 539; 27 C.J., 183; 27 C.J., 188, Secs. 117, 118; 25 R.C.L., 478; Annotations in 35 A.L.R., 1440; 62 A.L.R., 234; 129 A.L.R., 544, Annotations; 164 S.W., 416, 41 L.Ed., 495. As to contract being terminable at will of Respondent: 35 A.J., 461; 167 Mass. 544; 24 Pa. Co. Ct., 403; 109 Okla. 161, 235 P., 502; 182 S.C. 81, 188 S.E., 499; Annotations in 35 A.L.R., beginning at p. 1432, and in 62 A.L.R., beginning at p. 234.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
  • Mr. T.B. Bryant and Messrs. Felder and Rosen, all of Orangeburg, Counsel for Appellant, cite: As to contract for personal services coming within Statute of Frauds: Code of 1932, Sec. 7044; 60 S.C. 373, 38 S.E., 599, 181 S.C. 360, 187 S.E., 524; 27 C.J., 186; 27 C.J., 182; 27 C.J., 180; 46 S.C.L., 176; 187 S.C. 79, 196 S.E., 538; and cases therein discussed; 27 C.J., 176. As to lack of mutuality in alleged contracts for personal services: 182 S.C. 81, 188 S.E., 499. Messrs. Zeigler and Brailsford, of Orangeburg, counsel for Respondent, cite: As to Statute of Frauds being a bar to this action: 110 S.C. 534, 96 S.E., 538; 187 S.C. 79, 196 S.E., 539; 27 C.J., 183; 27 C.J., 188, Secs. 117, 118; 25 R.C.L., 478; Annotations in 35 A.L.R., 1440; 62 A.L.R., 234; 129 A.L.R., 544, Annotations; 164 S.W., 416, 41 L.Ed., 495. As to contract being terminable at will of Respondent: 35 A.J., 461; 167 Mass. 544; 24 Pa. Co. Ct., 403; 109 Okla. 161, 235 P., 502; 182 S.C. 81, 188 S.E., 499; Annotations in 35 A.L.R., beginning at p. 1432, and in 62 A.L.R., beginning at p. 234.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

WEBER v. PERRY.

July 9, 1942. The Opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. ASSOCIATE JUSTICE STUKES:

This Court is satisfied with the correctness of the conclusions of his Honor, Judge Greene, who heard the demurrer in this case on circuit. His order, dated December 22, 1941, will be reported. The exceptions have been carefully considered and are overruled.

Affirmed.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BONHAM, MR. ASSOCIATE JUSTICE FISHBURNE and CIRCUIT JUDGES PHILIP H. STOLL and E. H. HENDERSON, ACTING ASSOCIATE JUSTICES, concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

WEBER v. PERRY
(Jul 9, 1942)