Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

COMBINED METALS REDUCTION CO., Respondent v. TOOELE COUNTY, a body corporate and politic of the State of Utah, and Phares Haynes, as Treasurer of Tooele County, Utah Appellants.

See 51 Am.Jur., 660.

LARSON, Chief Justice.

This is a companion case to United States Smelting, Refining Mining Co. v. Phares Haynes, County Treasurer of Tooele County, decided this day, 111 Utah 172, 176 P.2d 622. The essential facts are the same and the issues present the same questions. The only essential difference is that here judgment was entered on the pleadings, while in that case evidence was taken. Since there is no essential difference in the facts and the issues are the same, the results must be the same. Upon the conclusions reached in that case, the judgment herein must be reversed. It is so ordered. Costs to appellants.

McDONOUGH, WADE, and WOLFE, JJ., concur.

PRATT, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his opinion in United States Smelting, Refining and Mining Company v. Phares Haynes, as County Treasurer of Tooele County.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

COMBINED METALS REDUCTION CO. v. TOOELE COUNTY
(Jan 6, 1947)