P.J. RITTER CO. v. BRIDGETON, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Advocates

For the appellant, Stanger Howell ( Robert G. Howell, of counsel). For the respondents, John A. Casarow ( David L. Hurovitz, of counsel).

Judges

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Advocates

For the appellant, Stanger Howell ( Robert G. Howell, of counsel). For the respondents, John A. Casarow ( David L. Hurovitz, of counsel).

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

P.J. RITTER CO., APPELLANT, v. THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF BRIDGETON ET AL.,RESPONDENTS.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, DONGES, EASTWOOD, WELLS, DILL, McLEAN, JJ. 6.

For reversal — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HEHER, BURLING, FREUND, SCHETTINO, JJ. 5.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.