Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Crimmal law — Mentally deficient offenders act — Section 13451-19 et seq., General Code — Conviction of sex offenses, burglary and other crimes — Convict referred for mental examination — Subsequent hearing in court on report of examining psychiatrist — Convict found subject to act — But not committed to Department of Public Welfare — Sentenced to penitentiary, life for burglary, various terms for other offenses — "Greater protection of the public" — Claim that commitment to Department of Public Welfare mandatory.
It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., TURNER, MATTHIAS, HART, SOHNGEN and STEWART, JJ., concur.
ZIMMERMAN, J., not participating.