Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
  • Mr. Perry E. Belfatto argued the case for the plaintiff-respondent. Mr. Joseph Coult argued the case for the defendant-appellant ( Coult Satz, attorneys).
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
  • Mr. Perry E. Belfatto argued the case for the plaintiff-respondent. Mr. Joseph Coult argued the case for the defendant-appellant ( Coult Satz, attorneys).
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

MARY SPENCE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM MAIER, DEFENDANT, DUGANBROTHERS OF NEW JERSEY, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review will be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Justice Burling in the former Supreme Court.

For affirmance: Chief Justice VANDERBILT and Justices HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD and ACKERSON — 5.

For reversal: None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

SPENCE v. MAIER
(Oct 18, 1948)