AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges

In the Matter of the Claim of ADELAIDE T. FISHER, Respondent, against ONE OAK DAIRY, INC., et al., Appellants. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION BOARD, Respondent.

Per Curiam.

Appeal by employer and carrier from an award of compensation in a death action. The evidence is sufficient to support the findings of the board that the deceased employee met his death as the result of an industrial accident.

No reversible error was committed by the referee in limiting cross-examination or in the reception of evidence relative to the criminal record of the witness Sheppard. In any judicial or quasi-judicial inquiry the credibility of any witness is always a most important factor. Irrespective of section 118 Work. Comp. of the Workmen's Compensation Law, that credibility may be attacked by proof that the witness has been convicted of a crime. Such proof may be adduced either on cross-examination or by the record of conviction. In the instant case the witness was not asked that specific question, nor was the judgment of conviction offered in evidence, and although the referee trod close to the line of error he did not cross it. Furthermore, the record and the admissions of counsel clearly indicate that the referee was fully aware of the conviction when he passed upon the credibility of the witness.

The award should be affirmed, with costs to the Workmen's Compensation Board.

HILL, P.J., HEFFERNAN, BREWSTER, RUSSELL and DEYO, JJ., concur.

Award affirmed, with costs to the Workmen's Compensation Board.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF FISHER v. ONE OAK DAIRY
(Sep 24, 1948)