KAPLAN v. MERANUS, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Advocates

Mr. Edward Gaulkin argued the cause for the defendants-appellants ( Mr. William L. Greenbaum, attorney). Mr. Samuel Roessler argued the cause for the plaintiff-respondent.

Judges

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Advocates

Mr. Edward Gaulkin argued the cause for the defendants-appellants ( Mr. William L. Greenbaum, attorney). Mr. Samuel Roessler argued the cause for the plaintiff-respondent.

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

JACOB KAPLAN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BENJAMIN MERANUS, ET AL.,DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review will be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Justice Case in the court below.

For affirmance: Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD and ACKERSON — 5.

For reversal: None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.