Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
  • Mr. S. Sidney Silver argued the cause for the petitioner-appellant. Mr. Charles M. Grosman argued the cause for the defendant-respondent ( Messrs. Robert D. and Charles M. Grosman, attorneys).
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
  • Mr. S. Sidney Silver argued the cause for the petitioner-appellant. Mr. Charles M. Grosman argued the cause for the defendant-respondent ( Messrs. Robert D. and Charles M. Grosman, attorneys).
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

ANNA LOTT, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM LOTT, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

PER CURIAM.

We concur in the conclusion reached in the court below that the appellant failed to prove and corroborate the allegations of her petition. The decree is accordingly affirmed.

For affirmance: Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices CASE, HEHER, WACHENFELD, BURLING, and ACKERSON — 6.

For reversal: None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

LOTT v. LOTT
(Jan 24, 1949)