Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
  • J. Harry Pershing, of Pittsburgh, Pa. (Van A. Barrickman, of Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for
  • W. Wendell Stanton,
  • U.S.
  • , of Pittsburgh, Pa. (Owen M. Burns, U.S.
  • , of Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for
Judges
  • Herbert Funk Goodrich
  • Harry Ellis Kalodner
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
  • J. Harry Pershing, of Pittsburgh, Pa. (Van A. Barrickman, of Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for
  • W. Wendell Stanton,
  • U.S.
  • , of Pittsburgh, Pa. (Owen M. Burns, U.S.
  • , of Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for
Judges
  • Herbert Funk Goodrich
  • Harry Ellis Kalodner
See more information ...
Smart Summary

UNITED STATES of America v. Benjamin J. HAYNES et al., Appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The points made by the appellant in this case were presented to the District Court and considered in an opinion filed by him. 81 F. Supp. 63. We have made independent examination of the points and our conclusion is that neither singly nor collectively is there anything in them meriting reversal.

The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

UNITED STATES v. HAYNES
(Mar 1, 1949)