Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

PARRISH, APPELLEE v. MYLES ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court — Dismissal, sua sponte — No debatable constitutional question involved — Appeal — Cognovit judgment in Municipal Court "suspended" — Case heard on merits and judgment for plaintiff — Bill of exceptions stricken by trial court — Insufficient to permit determination by reviewing court — Dismissal of appeal to Common Pleas Court — On ground no bill of exceptions — Affirmance by Court of Appeals — On ground appeal not proper remedy to compel signing of bill of exceptions — Inalienable rights — Due process — Section 1, Article I, Constitution — Section 1, Article XIV, Amendments, U.S. Constitution.

Per Curiam.

It is ordered and adjudged, sua sponte, that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, TURNER and TAFT, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PARRISH v. MYLES ET AL
(Oct 13, 1949)