Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Action by husband for damages for personal injury to wife — Motor vehicle collision — Directed verdict for defendant at close of all evidence — Claim that existence of negligence, proximate cause, jury questions under evidence — Right to jury trial — Section 5, Article I, Constitution.
It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, TURNER and TAFT, JJ., concur.