Motion pictures — Film censorship — Action to set aside and vacate order rejecting exhibition — Order not unreasonable or unlawful.
BY THE COURT.
The case presents to this court the single question whether the order of the defendant is unreasonable or unlawful. This court has viewed the film and is of the opinion that the order of the defendant rejecting it "on account of being harmful" is not unreasonable or unlawful. The prayer of the petition is denied.
Judgment for defendant.
WEYGANDT, C.J., MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, TURNER and TAFT, JJ., concur.