Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges

BARNET GARDNER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. YETTA GARDNER, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

PER CURIAM.

This case is factually similar to Voss v. Voss, 5 N.J. 402 , and the same questions are involved.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of this court in the Voss case, filed on even date herewith.

For affirmance — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices CASE, HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING and ACKERSON — 7.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GARDNER v. GARDNER
(Oct 16, 1950)