Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Criminal law — Keeping room for gambling — Section 13054, General Code — "Gambling" used in generic sense includes "bingo" — Instruction to jury provoked by accused's counsel — Evidence that game conducted for welfare fund rejected — Charge to jury.
Per Curiam.
It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, MIDDLETON, TAFT, MATTHIAS and HART, JJ., concur.