Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

REILLY, APPELLEE v. CONTI, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Municipal zoning ordinances — Right to enjoin operation of funeral home in residential district — Nonconforming use prior to effective date of ordinance — Not established, when — Premises not "used" as funeral home prior to ordinance — Emergency ordinances — Effect of failure to set forth reasons for emergency — Emergency clause not properly challenged by referendum or otherwise — Ordinance takes effect in manner of regular ordinance — Ordinance not retroactive, when — Inalienable rights — Inviolability of private property — Sections 1 and 19, Article I, Constitution — Due process — Section 1, Article XIV, Amendments, U.S. Constitution.

Per Curiam.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, MIDDLETON, MATTHIAS and HART, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

REILLY v. CONTI
(Oct 8, 1952)