Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges

JOHN DANEK, PLAINTIFF, v. JULIUS J. HOMMER AND KATHERYN HOMMER, PARTNERSTRADING AS HOMMER TOOL MFG. CO., DEFENDANTS AND THIRD-PARTYPLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Francis in the court below.

HEHER, J., concurring in result.

For affirmance — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING, JACOBS and BRENNAN — 7.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DANEK v. HOMMER
(Jun 14, 1954)