Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Public utilities — Franchise to erect pole line in city street — Rights of abutting owners — Access, light, air and view — Due process — Section 19, Article 1, Constitution.
Per Curiam.
It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., MIDDLETON, TAFT, HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART and LAMNECK, JJ., concur.