Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

CLOUGH v. GREYHOUND CORPORATION.

QUILLIAN, J.

The judgment of this court reversing the judgment of the trial court which overruled the motion for a new trial, having been reversed by the Supreme Court ( Greyhound Corporation v. Clough, 211 Ga. 574, 87 S.E.2d 387), the judgment of reversal by this court is hereby vacated.

We did not pass upon the general grounds of the motion for new trial when writing the original opinion in this case. No error of law requiring a new trial appears from the record, and there was sufficient conflict in the evidence as to whether the plaintiff sustained the injuries alleged in the petition to carry the issue to the jury. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Judgment affirmed. Felton, C. J., Gardner, P. J., Townsend, Carlisle, and Nichols, JJ., concur.

DECIDED JULY 7, 1955 — REHEARING DENIED JULY 26, 1955.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CLOUGH v. GREYHOUND CORPORATION
(Jul 7, 1955)