Supreme Court — Dismissal sua sponte — No debatable constitutional question involved — Criminal law — Municipal ordinance — Prohibiting operation of vehicle under influence of intoxicating liquor — Penalty — Constitutionality — Claimed conflict with general laws (Section 2947.13, Revised Code) — Evidence — Conduct of jury — Section 3, Article XVIII, Constitution — Powers of municipal corporations.
Per Curiam.
The appeal as of right herein is dismissed, sua sponte, for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, TAFT, MATTHIAS, BELL and HERBERT, JJ., concur.