PORT OF N.Y. AUTH. v. BAUMANN, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Advocates

Mr. Russell E. Watson for plaintiff-respondent, The Port of New York Authority ( Mr. Robert S. Tobin, of counsel). Mr. Nelson G. Gross for defendant-appellant, Elm Land Co., Inc. ( Messrs. Gross and Gross, attorneys).

Judges

PER CURIAM.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

PORT OF N.Y. AUTH. v. BAUMANN

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jan 23, 1961

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Advocates

Mr. Russell E. Watson for plaintiff-respondent, The Port of New York Authority ( Mr. Robert S. Tobin, of counsel). Mr. Nelson G. Gross for defendant-appellant, Elm Land Co., Inc. ( Messrs. Gross and Gross, attorneys).

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

THE PORT OF NEW YORK AUTHORITY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. OTTO K. BAUMANN,ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND ELM LAND CO., INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

The issues in this appeal, which was certified on our own motion prior to argument in the Appellate Division, are the same as those presented in Port of New York Authority v. Heming and Cervieri, 33 N.J. 144 . The parties having agreed that the determination in that case would be controlling, and our opinion affirming the judgment therein having been filed, the judgment herein is accordingly affirmed.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS and HALL — 4.

For reversal — Justices PROCTOR and SCHETTINO — 2.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

PORT OF N.Y. AUTH. v. BAUMANN

THE PORT OF NEW YORK AUTHORITY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. OTTO K. BAUMANN,ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND ELM LAND CO., INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Comments