Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

CARL G. TENGBERG, APPELLANT, v. CURRENT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY AND ALASKA WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION BOARD, APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM.

The Alaska Workmen's Compensation Board found that appellant had suffered a thirty-three and one third percent permanent partial loss of use of his right leg and awarded compensation in the sum of $2,871.

On appeal to the Superior Court for the Third Judicial District summary judgment was granted in favor of the Board and against appellant Tengberg. Appeal was then taken to this court.

The facts and the law governing this case are similar to those involved in Cesar v. Alaska Workmen's Compensation Board, Op. No. 150, 383 P.2d 805 (Alaska 1963).

Based upon our decision in the Cesar case, we hereby affirm the judgment of the Superior Court.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TENGBERG v. CURRENT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
(Oct 4, 1963)