Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, PLAINTIFF, v. MARY D. BENNETT ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon certified question under Rule 4.6, F.A.R., 31 F.S.A., from the Circuit Court of Hillsborough County, Florida and on briefs of counsel for the respective parties and it appearing that the question certified does not meet the prerequisites of Rule 4.61, F.A.R. as interpreted in prior decisions of this Court, it is ordered that answer to the certified question be and the same is hereby declined. See: Dade County v. Philbrick, 162 So.2d 266, and special concurring opinion of Justice Hobson in State Road Department v. Forehand, 56 So.2d 901.

DREW, C.J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY v. BENNETT
(Apr 7, 1965)