DIME SAVINGS BANK OF BROOKLYN v. BEECHER, N.Y., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Advocates

Joseph P. Hoey, United States Attorney ( Joseph Rosenzweig of counsel), for United States of America, appellant and appellant-respondent. James J. Milligan, William A. Anzalone and George H. Sintenis for Dime Savings Bank of Brooklyn, respondent. Stanley Beals and John L.A. Bond for Jamaica Savings Bank, respondent-appellant. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General ( Charles A. La Torella, Jr., and Samuel A. Hirshowitz of counsel), amicus curiae. Morris H. Schneider, County Attorney ( Seymour S. Ross and Jerome F. Matedero of counsel), for County of Nassau, amicus curiae. Martin A. Meyer, Jr., for Savings Banks Association of New York State, amicus curiae.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

DIME SAVINGS BANK OF BROOKLYN v. BEECHER

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Mar 31, 1966

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Advocates

Joseph P. Hoey, United States Attorney ( Joseph Rosenzweig of counsel), for United States of America, appellant and appellant-respondent. James J. Milligan, William A. Anzalone and George H. Sintenis for Dime Savings Bank of Brooklyn, respondent. Stanley Beals and John L.A. Bond for Jamaica Savings Bank, respondent-appellant. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General ( Charles A. La Torella, Jr., and Samuel A. Hirshowitz of counsel), amicus curiae. Morris H. Schneider, County Attorney ( Seymour S. Ross and Jerome F. Matedero of counsel), for County of Nassau, amicus curiae. Martin A. Meyer, Jr., for Savings Banks Association of New York State, amicus curiae.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

DIME SAVINGS BANK OF BROOKLYN, Respondent, v. CHARLES J. BEECHER et al., Defendants, and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant. JAMAICA SAVINGS BANK, Respondent-Appellant,

In the first above-entitled action: Appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action as to appellant within the meaning of the Constitution.

In the second above-entitled action: Appeals dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action as to appellants within the meaning of the Constitution.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

DIME SAVINGS BANK OF BROOKLYN v. BEECHER

DIME SAVINGS BANK OF BROOKLYN, Respondent, v. CHARLES J. BEECHER et al., Defendants, and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant. JAMAICA SAVINGS BANK, Respondent-Appellant,

Comments