Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges

JOHN J. CARROLL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF CAMDEN, A MUNICIPALCORPORATION, THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF CAMDEN, A BODY CORPORATEAND POLITIC, AND THE CAMDEN CITY PLANNING BOARD, A BODY CORPORATE, POLITICAND A MUNICIPAL AGENCY, AND THE DELAWARE RIVER PORT AUTHORITY OFPENNSYLVANIA AND NEW JERSEY, A BODY CORPORATE AND POLITIC,DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial constitutional question.

For dismissal — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL and SCHETTINO — 6.

Opposed — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CARROLL v. CAMDEN
(Jun 6, 1966)