MUNOZ REALTY CORP. v. VERONA, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Advocates

Mr. Newton H. Porter, Jr. argued the cause for appellant ( Messrs. Porter Hobart, of counsel). Mr. Emil E. Mascia argued the cause for respondent ( Messrs. Sarcone Mascia, of counsel).

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

MUNOZ REALTY CORP. v. VERONA

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Dec 21, 1966

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Advocates

Mr. Newton H. Porter, Jr. argued the cause for appellant ( Messrs. Porter Hobart, of counsel). Mr. Emil E. Mascia argued the cause for respondent ( Messrs. Sarcone Mascia, of counsel).

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

MUNOZ REALTY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOROUGH OF VERONA,DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The opinion of the court was delivered

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division of the Superior Court is affirmed for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division. For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 6.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

MUNOZ REALTY CORP. v. VERONA

MUNOZ REALTY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOROUGH OF VERONA,DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Comments