Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

HALL v. THE STATE.

PANNELL, Judge.

1. The brief filed by the appellant in this case, except as to the general grounds of the motion for new trial, does not meet the requirements of Rule 17 (a) (1) and Rule 17 (c) (3) (A) and Rule 17 (c) (3) (B) of this court adopted by it on July 21, 1965, and effective August 1, 1965, in that there is no citation or reference to the record or transcript. Accordingly, under the decisions of the court in Strickland v. English, 115 Ga. App. 384 (2) ( 154 S.E.2d 710) and Crider v. State of Ga., 115 Ga. App. 347 (1) ( 154 S.E.2d 743), the enumerations of error for which there is no reference made in either the enumeration or the brief will be considered as abandoned.

2. There was sufficient evidence to corroborate the testimony of the accomplices that the defendant here participated in the burglary for which he was charged and convicted.

Judgment affirmed. Jordan, P. J., and Deen, J., concur.

ARGUED FEBRUARY 7, 1968 — DECIDED APRIL 4, 1968 — REHEARING DENIED APRIL 19, 1968 — CERT. APPLIED FOR.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HALL v. STATE
(Apr 4, 1968)