Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates

STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JIM PATRICK PATTERSON, Appellant.

AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted of threatening the commission of a felony, ORS 161.330, and placed on probation.

Later, after hearing, the probation was revoked. The evidence was that in addition to failing to meet certain conditions of probation, the defendant had committed an assault and battery.

On appeal defendant contends that in the revocation proceeding the trial court should not have received testimony regarding the alleged assault and battery because he had not yet been tried for that crime. This court held in State v. Spicer, 3 Or. App. 80, 81, 471 P.2d 865 (1970):

" '* * * It is not necessary to revocation that the person on probation be convicted of a new crime, but only that the trial judge be satisfied that the purposes of probation are not being served, or that the terms thereof have been violated * * *.' Barker v. Ireland, 238 Or. 1, 4, 392 P.2d 769 (1964)."

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. PATTERSON
(Oct 2, 1970)