Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges

STEVEN E. SABLOFF, AN INFANT BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, HERBERT SABLOFF,AND HERBERT SABLOFF, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. YAMAHA MOTORCO., LTD. AND YAMAHA INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, A CORPORATION,DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND HARLEY-DAVIDSON OF ESSEX, A NEW JERSEYCORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-CROSS-APPELLANTS.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed for the reasons given in its opinion reported at 113 N.J. Super. 279.

We add that whenever the facts permit an inference that the harmful event ensued from some defect (whether identifiable or not) in the product, the issue of liability is for the jury, and the plaintiff is not necessarily confined to the explanation his expert may advance.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and MOUNTAIN — 7.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SABLOFF v. YAMAHA MOTOR CO., LTD
(Nov 8, 1971)