Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. PATRICK M. ISLEIB, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM:

On consideration of the record, we are convinced that the Government introduced sufficient evidence, expert and lay, to persuade the jury beyond a reasonable doubt that Isleib was not legally insane at the time he committed the armed robbery of which he was convicted below. Blake v. United States, 5 Cir. 1968, 407 F.2d 908; Mims v. United States, 5 Cir. 1967, 375 F.2d 135; United States v. Pitts, 5 Cir. 1970, 428 F.2d 534.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

UNITED STATES v. ISLEIB
(Mar 28, 1972)