Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. CHARLES D. CAMERON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM:

This case is before us for the second time. On the first appeal we pretermitted a consideration of the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction and reversed on other grounds.

United States v. Cameron, 5 Cir. 1972, 460 F.2d 1394.

On the second trial a jury found Cameron guilty of having $560 in his possession knowing that it was stolen from a bank whose deposits were insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 2113(c). His sole contention on appeal is that there was insufficient evidence to sustain a conviction.

We have carefully considered the record, and, taking the view most favorable to the Government, we find substantial evidence to support the verdict of the jury. Glasser v. United States, 1942, 315 U.S. 60, 80, 62 S.Ct. 457, 86 L.Ed. 680. The judgment is

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

UNITED STATES v. CAMERON
(Feb 13, 1973)