Citation Codes Equivalent Citations citation codes Docket Number No. 72-3426. Summary Calendar. Advocates Irby Sprouse, Jr., pro se. John W. Stokes, Jr., U.S. Atty., Anthony M. Arnold, Asst. U.S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for respondents-appellees. Judges John Minor Wisdom Robert Andrew Ainsworth Charles Clark See more information ... Smart Summary Please sign up to generate summary. OPINION IRBY SPROUSE, JR., PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. CHARLES C. MOORE, CASEWORKER, U.S. PENITENTIARY, AND J.D. HENDERSON, WARDEN, ETC., RESPONDENTS-APPELLEES. PER CURIAM: Appellant, an inmate of the federal penitentiary in Atlanta, Georgia, appeals from the denial by the United States District Court of his petition for mandamus to force the prison authorities to allow him the use of typewriters for legal correspondence and matters other than formal motions to the courts. We affirm. As we just recently said in Stubblefield v. Henderson, 5 Cir., 1973, 475 F.2d 26: "It is well established that an inmate has no federally protected right to the use of typewriters to prepare legal writs. Williams v. United States Department of Justice, 5th Cir., 1970, 433 F.2d 958; Durham v. Blackwell, 5th Cir., 1969, 409 F.2d 838; see also Tarlton v. Henderson, 5th Cir. 1972, 467 F.2d 200. It follows, therefore, that an inmate has no federally protected right to use typewriters for correspondence, whether personal or legal." Affirmed.