Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

ROBERT ALLEN DAVENPORT, APPELLANT (DEFENDANT), v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE (STATE).

MILLS, Judge.

The question raised by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in imposing a sentence on Davenport without the benefit of a presentence investigation and recommendation where the record does not show a previous felony offense. The trial court erred. Angel v. State, 305 So.2d 283 (Fla. App.1st, 1974).

The record in this case is silent as to a previous felony offense. Rule 3.170, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides that no sentence shall be imposed on a defendant found guilty of a first felony offense until a presentence investigation and recommendation has been received and considered by the sentencing judge. As the trial court's error was a mere defect in sentencing, reversal is not required.

This case is remanded with the following directions:

1. the trial court may hold a hearing at which it must be established that the defendant has been convicted previously of a felony, and if he has been convicted, reimpose the sentence, or

2. the trial court may vacate the sentence, then obtain a presentence investigation and recommendation, consider them, and resentence the defendant.

BOYER, C.J., and McCORD, J., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DAVENPORT v. STATE
(Aug 28, 1975)