Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. EDITH M. RUSSELL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Pressler for the Bergen County Court which is reported at 135 N.J. Super. 154 (Law Div. 1975). See also, State v. Bucich, 134 N.J. Super. 111 (App.Div. 1975), certif. den. 68 N.J. 280 (1975).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. RUSSELL
(Nov 24, 1975)