Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

OHIO STATE BAR ASSOCIATION v. WILLARD.

Attorneys at law — Misconduct — Disbarment — Acts warranting.

Per Curiam.

Upon review of the hearing by the board, we find that the charges against respondent were accurate and substantiated. Respondent's conduct and subsequent disregard for these proceedings reflect most unfavorably upon the entire legal profession.

We accept the board's recommendation, and respondent is permanently disbarred from the practice of law.

Judgment accordingly.

HERBERT, CELEBREZZE, W. BROWN, P. BROWN, SWEENEY and LOCHER, JJ., concur.

O'NEILL, C.J., not participating.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

OHIO STATE BAR ASSN. v. WILLARD
(Apr 13, 1977)