Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

IN THE INTEREST OF I.D.K., A CHILD.

PER CURIAM.

The juvenile defendant herein pled guilty to one petition and not guilty to two other petitions. The juvenile was tried on the two not guilty pleas and found guilty. A motion to withdraw the guilty plea was made and denied. Eventually, the juvenile was adjudicated guilty of all three offenses and committed to the Division of Youth Services. Although certain procedural irregularities do appear in regard to acceptance of the initial plea of guilty, we are convinced from the totality of the record that the commitment to the Division of Youth Services was entirely proper and supported by the record and the adjudications of guilt on the two contested charges. These two adjudications are also before us on appeal and they are hereby affirmed. Since we believe the result to be the same, the matter below is affirmed in its entirety.

CROSS, ANSTEAD and BERANEK, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN THE INTEREST OF I.D.K
(Jul 12, 1978)